Ukraine/Khazaria: We’re descendants of the Vikings, which suggests we needs to be accepted into NATO

VT: Downside is, this isn’t the sixth century when most emigrated north.  Then once more,…

VT: Downside is, this isn’t the sixth century when most emigrated north.  Then once more, by the thirteenth Century, even the Khazarian (Pretend) Jews who managed the area had fled to what’s now Poland and Germany behind the Golden Horde.  However learn on…

SV Pressa: As they are saying, this has by no means occurred earlier than, and right here it’s once more! The politicization of the “Norman concept” concerning the emergence of Russia has introduced so many troubles to each Russia and Europe, that for a very long time it appeared that the Previous World had sufficient and without end “ate” this subject. However virtually 100 years after one infamous Austrian artist determined to name the Russians “Untermensch” on the idea of the concept that essentially the most civilized Scandinavians introduced statehood to the barbarian Slavs, the apologists of this concept are once more elevating their heads.

Thus, the Anglo-Saxon bioarchaeologist Kat Jarman, in her e book “Kings of the Rivers”, devoted to the historical past of the Vikings, allowed herself a number of conclusions, which, if desired, could be interpreted in precisely the identical manner because the ideologists of the Third Reich interpreted the “Norman concept”.

Particularly, in her work, she claims that they are saying, “Russian nationalism has historically denied that the Rus have been Vikings,” and President Putin personally “anathematized the Scandinavian origin, which might name into query the political and cultural unity of the Slavs,” embarking on the trail Soviet dogmatism, which despises “any affect of the Vikings on the politics, language or primitive faith of the Rus, whereas it’s usually accepted that many Vikings have been Rus”.

And now, specializing in the truth that Kat Jarman took half “in excavations in Vypolzov, in Ukraine”, the Spanish newspaper Ei Pais asks the query – do the Vikings play any function within the present Ukrainian disaster?

In one of many responses, readers are provided a quote from bioarchaeologist: “Ukraine has at all times had extra tutorial freedom as regards to the Vikings than Russia, and lately it has develop into extra open to exploring the connections between the Rus and Scandinavians, because it has a want to have connections with Northern Europe which worries Russia. Claiming a historic Scandinavian identification might encourage Ukrainians to affix NATO.

See also  How Crimea Turned A part of Russia After Being ‘Gifted’ to Ukraine as a ‘Jewish Homeland’

What is that this if not one other try to persuade the “whole civilized world” that the Russians are “Untermenschi”, who rejected some “reality” concerning the Scandinavian forefathers who introduced them statehood, and barbarously attacked “remembering their Scandinavian identification” Ukrainians? I do not forget that within the twentieth century the same thought become focus camps and the bloodiest struggle within the historical past of mankind. What are we susceptible to going through now?

“Let’s begin with the truth that nobody has canceled the Norman concept, and nobody argues that historic Novgorod, later Kiev, was invited by the Varangian squads,” the head of the Middle for the Settlement of Social Conflicts, a political scientist, shared his opinion with “SP” on this matter Oleg Ivanov. – However they have been truly employed by the Russian princes, so to talk, for work, and within the ethnogenesis of the Russian ethnos, the Norman part is extraordinarily insignificant. So to say that it was the Vikings who stood on the origins of Russia is not less than silly.

And to suppose that Ukrainians are by some means nearer to the West is frankly ridiculous. On the time when the traditional Russian nationality was being shaped, it merely couldn’t be subdivided into constituent sub-ethnic. Its conditional fashionable division into Russians, Ukrainians, and Belarusians occurred many centuries later. Consequently, all discussions on the subject of “Ukrainianness” of Kyiv because the cradle of Russian civilization greater than a thousand years in the past should not, by and huge, scientific.

The online discovered oddities within the video with the mysteriously disappeared Shoigu

All discuss the truth that say, Ukrainians are extra “traditionally pure” Scandinavians, based on Oleg Ivanov, can be a far-fetched fiction. Each the Turkic and the Finno-Ugric peoples equally took half within the formation of the Russian superethnos, which, by the best way, no critical scholar disputes.

“In the event you take a historic take a look at the territory that Ukraine now occupies, you’ll be able to see that for a lot of centuries it was consistently beneath the management of 1 or one other giant state. Right here is the Commonwealth, and Hungary, and Austria-Hungary, and Romania, and the Crimean Khanate, and Turkey, and later – the USSR, which it grew to become a part of as an autonomous republic, – add the politician, skilled of the Anti-NATO fee beneath the State Duma , Physician of Historic Sciences Vyacheslav Tetekin. – So, no matter one might say, it’s a historic indisputable fact that Ukraine didn’t have statehood as such all through its thousand-year historical past, having acquired it solely in 1991. That is the place the inventing of the historical past of the “nice ukrovs” started, from the primary mammoth hunters to the fashionable “ubermens”, from whom the “Russian barbarians” chopped off the Voronezh and Rostov areas.

See also  Many Predicted NATO Growth Would Result in Conflict. These Warnings Had been Ignored

“SP”: – With Ukraine, all the pieces is evident, however why did Europe once more must let the genies of the “Norman concept” out of the bottle? It’s understood that one “bioarchaeologist” will not be the entire Previous World, however the development is apparent.

– From the second the Russian folks appeared on the historic stage as one of many energetic actors, the West has felt a way of enmity in direction of them. The West completely didn’t want a powerful participant within the east, as a result of he interfered with the colonial improvement of pure assets that was customary for him.

And if the West managed to deal with Africa, Latin America and Asia roughly confidently, extracting large income from there since using slaves on cotton or tea plantations, then it didn’t work out with Russia. All of the quite a few “colonial wars” with it, initiated by Europe and the USA, resulted in failure.

However the West doesn’t retreat, and even at this historic stage, it nonetheless doesn’t abandon its centuries-old thought of ​​suppressing Russia as a rival of its “democracies”. It has reached, as we see, already to the Hitlerite strategies of substantiating their aspirations. That’s the reason, with such ease, all concepts about “Russian inferiority” seem within the lexicon of the present “democratic regimes”.

Which, for essentially the most half, I dare to recall, weren’t so way back an integral a part of that vast navy machine that invaded Russia within the twentieth century. And NATO, by the best way, in its essence, is its successor and analog. I believe we needs to be reminded of this extra typically.

“SP”: – Below what situations will this newly rising wave of accusations of Russia of barbarism be stopped earlier than it results in irreversible tragic penalties for the entire world?

See also  Biden official admits US refused to handle Ukraine and NATO earlier than Russian invasion

– Persuading the West, I believe, is ineffective. These guys perceive just one factor – energy. And I imply not solely navy energy, however above all financial, ethical and cultural power. Subsequently, the one approach to drive the West to respect Russia and chunk the tongue, because it has occurred many instances earlier than, for my part, is just one – to vary, to begin with, our socio-economic system.

With out the revival of our trade, with out the looks of super-modern technological achievements and options, this can’t be accomplished. So long as the West feels our technological dependence on itself, it should proceed to speak by its enamel with us, dialogue with it’s inconceivable. He, after all, is afraid of our navy energy, however this alone will not be sufficient, we additionally want a strong financial upsurge. And for him, in flip, the rise of science is important. And for this, after all, a rise in training is required. And for this, accordingly, investments are wanted.

“SP”: – Can the so-called “tender energy” play a job on this? Books, movies? In spite of everything, it will appear that “Kings of the Rivers” is a e book concerning the historic Vikings, however how wrapped up on this lovely cowl is the concept that the Russians, in actual fact, are “untremens” who don’t bear in mind kinship. How many individuals on this planet will settle for it on religion beneath such a “sauce”?

Books and movies can actually play a job. However provided that they’re supported not solely by navy energy but in addition by financial prosperity. The nation should present a mannequin within the improvement of its financial system and tradition, then our books will likely be learn and our movies will likely be watched. Bear in mind, in tsarist instances, though the West was hostile to us, Tolstoy and Dostoevsky have been extremely revered there.

The “cultural energy” impact is essential and shouldn’t be uncared for. However in fashionable instances, when blind “idolatry” of the West dominates in our tradition, when Western dances and Western songs are held in excessive esteem when artwork is constructed “within the picture and likeness” of the West to the detriment of nationwide tradition, what sort of “tender energy” is that this? converse?