James Fetzer: Defending the first and 2nd Amendments

VT recommends efforts to help Dr. Fetzer’s case.  Please go to his website: After I…

VT recommends efforts to help Dr. Fetzer’s case.  Please go to his website:

After I printed No one Died at Sandy Hook: It was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Management (2015; 2nd ed., 2016), with 13 contributors (together with six Ph.D. professors), amazon.com banned the e-book lower than a month later (despite the fact that it had bought practically 500 copies). I launched it without cost as a PDF. Mike Adams wrote about it, “The Most Harmful Thoughts in America” on False Flags and Excessive Censorship.

That was solely the start. Now amazon has banned 5 extra of my books, the place I deliver collectively specialists on completely different elements of those occasions to kind out what actually occurred. In 2018, I used to be sued for defamation in Madison, WI, over an uncertified demise certificates given to co-author Kelley Watt by a purported Sandy Hook father or mother, Leonard Pozner.

The go well with was introduced by the identical celebration who had shared it with Kelley Watt. The Court docket wouldn’t permit me to current my proof that no one had died on the (absurd) floor that it had nothing to do with the reality or accuracy of the demise certificates, which alleged the decedent–Noah Pozner–died at Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012 of “a number of gunshot wounds”.

Focusing solely on the demise certificates, I launched stories from two forensic doc examiners, each of whom concluded that it was faux, however the Court docket merely set them apart as “another person’s opinion”. Ignoring my standing as a journalist, the Court docket ignored the disputed reality of the authenticity of the doc and located me responsible of defamation, despite the fact that there was no discovering of negligence.

See also  Fetzer and the Zio-Juggernaut from Sandy Hook

So I used to be responsible of defamation with out fault. The trial for damages was captured completely by Kevin Barrett, “The Authorized Lynching of a Reality-Seeker: Jim Fetzer’s Stalinist-Type Present Trial”. After I appealed the abuse of Abstract Judgment, the Wisconsin Court docket of Appeals District IV made (what Ron Avery characterizes as) gross errors.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court docket has denied my Petition for Evaluation and not using a phrase of clarification the identical day Remington settles for $73,000,000 with out establishing that anybody died at Sandy Hook. The faux taking pictures is getting used to undermine our proper to maintain and bear arms, because it was deliberate to do.

As a former Marine Corps officer, I’m profoundly obligated to hold this case to the US Supreme Court docket as a result of, whether or not I’m proper or unsuitable, I used to be denied the fitting to current a protection. I’ve been saddled with $1.1m in liens because of a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Towards Public Participation) to punish those that communicate out and expose fraud and corruption by the federal government. I’m doing what I can to guard your rights–however now I want your assist!

If the choice on this absurd case, Pozner v. Fetzer, is allowed to face, it can set a precedent that threatens the authorized proper of each US citizen to defend himself in a Court docket of Legislation. As a result of the staged Sandy Hook occasion is getting used to seize our weapons, the result is important for each the first and the 2nd Amendments. I’ve the regulation and proof on my facet, however want your help to maneuver ahead. This case could make a distinction.

See also  The Syrian Homeland

My Petition for Evaluation by the Wisconsin Supreme Court docket has been denied and not using a phrase of clarification. Right here’s a brief model of what occurred, which is about as outrageous because it will get. But the best WI court docket has handed on it, unwilling to scrub up the mess of the Circuit and Appellate Courts within the state:

ATTENTION READERS
As a result of nature of impartial content material, VT can not assure content material validity.
We ask you to Learn Our Content material Coverage so a transparent comprehension of VT’s impartial non-censored media is known and given its correct place on this planet of stories, opinion and media.

All content material is owned by creator completely. Expressed opinions are NOT essentially the views of VT, different authors, associates, advertisers, sponsors, companions or technicians. Some content material could also be satirical in nature. All photographs inside are full duty of creator and NOT VT.

About VT – Learn Full Coverage Discover – Remark Coverage